<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuon presentation: Friday 14 and Saturday 15 November 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saynotoharrington.com/2008/11/nuon-presentation-friday-14-and-saturday-15-november-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saynotoharrington.com/2008/11/nuon-presentation-friday-14-and-saturday-15-november-2008/</link>
	<description>This Affects Your Home!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 02:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: J. Raughton</title>
		<link>http://www.saynotoharrington.com/2008/11/nuon-presentation-friday-14-and-saturday-15-november-2008/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Raughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 14:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saynotoharrington.com/?p=143#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Having just read the proposal for Harrington, I do feel the majority of objections are just temporary. Would there be this much opposition if local roads need to be resurfaced and take 6 months to finish the job, there may be just as much disruption.  I have a view of a wind farm from my bedroom window and have had for well over a decade, (not at present as it is foggy). Its not a big deal, it is using the resources of the land for the future. Do you want future generations growing up with no or little sustainable energy supply because your view may be ruined, or the noise it may generate would be akin to being in a library.  This technology has been developed to be as sensitive to its surroundings as possible. If you do not use electricity for anything, I take it back, and you have every right to complain, but in the long run what is more harmful to you? not being able to live adequately or a little disruption now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having just read the proposal for Harrington, I do feel the majority of objections are just temporary. Would there be this much opposition if local roads need to be resurfaced and take 6 months to finish the job, there may be just as much disruption.  I have a view of a wind farm from my bedroom window and have had for well over a decade, (not at present as it is foggy). Its not a big deal, it is using the resources of the land for the future. Do you want future generations growing up with no or little sustainable energy supply because your view may be ruined, or the noise it may generate would be akin to being in a library.  This technology has been developed to be as sensitive to its surroundings as possible. If you do not use electricity for anything, I take it back, and you have every right to complain, but in the long run what is more harmful to you? not being able to live adequately or a little disruption now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

